Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][CLAM] CLAMs, Proof-Of-Chain, Proof-Of-Working-Stake, a.k.a. "Clamcoin"
by
dooglus
on 10/11/2015, 16:07:14 UTC
Doog, not sure if you read my entire post, but I don't advocate leaving things as they are necessarily. What I was getting at is that changes are not necessarily bad as long as they are made in order to preserve the fairness of the coin and its core principles, and not its monetary value. The changes that were implemented that you speak of were done in that manner, and that's ok.
My suggestion as a solution was to restrict large commercial entities with access to other people's addy's from digging, like exchanges and gambling sites. That was not the intent of the distribution model and is not fair to average joes, especially ones whose addy's the exchanges would use to dig. I was hoping you would chime in as to the feasibility of "isolating" such digs, technically speaking. Is it possible?

I did read your post. Sorry for skipping over most of it in my reply.

I don't think it's really feasible to determine which wallets are "big commercial" and which aren't. Then there are the big commercial entities like poloniex who dug their large wallet and shared the CLAMs with their users. That should be OK with us, right? So then we have to be able to determine who is sharing their CLAMs and who isn't. And it all becomes a giant mess, with 'us' having to snoop into 'their' business to determine who gets to dig and who doesn't.