the rules of this network lends it to being consensus driven
Point of information. The implementation of this peer-to-peer networked cryptocurrency
dictates that it be consensus-driven; the only practicable leadership in this context is thought leadership.
So would you prefer not to have the current holders be allowed to vote for what they want?
Point of information. The notion of a plebiscite is irrelevant to a peer-to-peer networked cryptocurrency; there is no central authority to enforce the result.
One insight that I've had confirmed by this discussion: the functioning of any altcoin community is seriously hampered by the absence of a reliable mirror.Cheers
Graham