This is precisely why retrospectively choosing a snapshot block is unfair.
Clam was built on a fair and unique distribution model,
CLAM was built by retrospectively choosing a snapshot block.
Don't you see the contradiction in your two sentences?
Apologies. Yes I do. I wasn't aware of that. However, that helps explain why there is a large holder/digger in the coin who has no (emotional/rational) stake in the future of Clam and just sees it as representing BTC profit. Many people day and margin trade this coin without any real personal interest or stake in the future development or survival of Clam or Clam 2.0, so how exactly is this learning from previous mistakes? With the secret retrospective snapshot, the exact same result could occur i.e. large holder who wants to dump only for profit. Or am I missing something? Either way, in terms of PR, the way this is being handled is a disaster.
IMO I think best to leave as is.