What Core did with the recent hard fork is also rather disgusting, they used the same version number for the blocks as BIP101, they did this on purpose in order to undermine BIP101. This represents a deliberate move by Core in order to circumvent the legitimate decision making process of proof of work.
Fork off you worthless disingenuous troll
Notice XT developer jtoomin's response below, lol.
Veritas Sapere, how aware were you of how poorly your accusation corresponded with the facts, before you made your accusation?
BIP 9 is for version flags support, which is designed to allow for multiple forks to be deployed in parallel without running into interference issues like what we have with BIP101 and BIP65. When Core decided to implement BIP65, they chose to do it without version bits support and to just use v4 for the blocks.
Rather than use the old version bits, Core decided to not use any version bits, or something like that. Yes, it was a deliberate choice.
Not what he was saying on reddit though, is it? Can we have the link to these jtoomin quotes so we can tell when he wrote them, it's difficult to tell with you whether you're getting things wrong due to incompetence or conceit (it can only be one or the other).