More then 75% of the mining power supports an increase in the blocksize today.
More than ~95% of the userbase support blocksize increases (when needed). Just not your favoured plan. The one that you keep trying to push on everyone, day after day, month after month.
Just to be clear BIP101 is not necessarily my favorite proposal, it is just the only proposal which has been implemented so far. I would support BIP100 or BIP103 as well when implemented, especially if that means we can reach a higher level of consensus. I know you like to depict me as being some sort of XT fanatic but that is simply just not true. I support an increase in the blocksize and I support having multiple implementations so that the community can decide for themselves what they think is the best solution, which would be better then just blindly accepting whatever Core hands down to us.
I depict you as an XT subversive, which is very different to "fanatic". Conveniently for my argument, you proved the subversive component when you used subversion to misrepresent my position. The irony.
Despite the fact that you claim support of other scaling solutions, why do you only ever talk about using the blocksize to achieve it, and despite all this, why do you so frequently end up using the expression "...and that's why I support XT"? It's like your catchphrase.