Ninjastic
PostEdited versionsQuotes to this post
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin XT - Officially #REKT (also goes for BIP101 fraud)
by
VeritasSapere
on 17/11/2015, 17:08:44 UTC
Quote from: Carlton Banks on November 17, 2015, 05:04:23 PM
Quote from: VeritasSapere on November 17, 2015, 04:21:12 PM
Quote from: brg444 on November 17, 2015, 04:15:22 PM
Quote from: VeritasSapere on November 17, 2015, 04:04:29 PM
Quote from: Carlton Banks on November 17, 2015, 03:55:17 PM
Quote from: brg444 on November 17, 2015, 03:46:23 PM
Quote from: VeritasSapere on November 17, 2015, 03:24:40 PM
What Core did with the recent hard fork is also rather disgusting, they used the same version number for the blocks as BIP101, they did this on purpose in order to undermine BIP101. This represents a deliberate move by Core in order to circumvent the legitimate decision making process of proof of work.
Fork off you worthless disingenuous troll
Notice XT developer jtoomin's response below, lol.

Veritas Sapere, how aware were you of how poorly your accusation corresponded with the facts, before you made your accusation?

Quote from: jtoomim
BIP 9 is for version flags support, which is designed to allow for multiple forks to be deployed in parallel without running into interference issues like what we have with BIP101 and BIP65. When Core decided to implement BIP65, they chose to do it without version bits support and to just use v4 for the blocks.
Quote from: jtoomim
Rather than use the old version bits, Core decided to not use any version bits, or something like that. Yes, it was a deliberate choice.
More shameless misconstruction of facts.

Purposefully omitting to include the part where toomim clearly indicates he is unaware of the details and "technicalities" that went into Core's decision

Listen to your master now would ya?
It is of my opinion that they should have done this differently, what toomim says does not change that. I am also my own master whether you believe that or not.
So you deliberately excised the part where Toomim admits he is ignorant of the reasons behind the version bits change? To present it as Toomin levelling accusations at the Core team? Oh dear. I wonder how Toomim himself feels about your misrepresentation of his post?
I was not misrepresenting anyone. I quoted toomim stating a fact, not his opinion, it is true that he himself does not have a strong opinion on this matter but I do, I do not see what is wrong with this. You seemed pretty determined attacking me today, calling me subversive and accusing me of misrepresentation.