Basically however you can spin it to get your way is fine right?  Creative is here to do your dirty work for you, so you don't have to be the on directly spitting in peoples faces and losing investor confidence... Creative has been doing that since I've heard of CLAM .

Y'all are going to keep pounding at this thing till peoples gifted CLAMs are removed.

Be it voting, new coin or other trickery.

I'd never buy my Clamcoins back just to vote with a few shitcoin devs and a power tripping Bitcoiner.  Anyone who would sink $10,000 into voting is a fucktard IMO.  The rich should never have more vote than the poor.  Creative and I had this talk when I owned a huge chunk of the network... we both agreed it was bad news bears, but now when it is "needed" to push a highly questionable fork that obviously doesn't have consensus .... well tada  .

I plan on voting with my services and cranking the faucets transactions up even more... hopefully voting is based on transactions because we can handle that... I think we created the most CLAM transactions as well out of any service at this point.