LoL !

So let me get this straight. A coin is delivered into the mining community with an intentionally installed defect and left there. A vigilant technologist notices and takes advantage of same defect to rape the coin supply for a full three months, at one point acquiring more than 50% of the network hashpower by just solo mining, knowing he was doing so at the expense of the rest of the community who mined in good faith thinking they were at least on a level playing field as far as software went.

Then members of that coin's project community and staff have the brass neck to go parading their self-righteous faux "ethical launch" propaganda round all of bitcointalk for a year and citing it as a basis for maligning otherwise hard working projects who's launch was 'less than perfect'.

And finally, you choose this same self-serving opportunist as your ethical arbiter of the situation over Vitalic, who's only crime was to state (correctly - albeit in robust terms) that the launch was unfair, without apportioning blame to any individuals ?

Tell you what - you pour the cokes, I'll do the jokes