As the father of 3 mixed children myself (wife is Asian and I am white) I have to call you out on this.
You misquoted me entirely. I said both Caucasian and Asian genes are recessive compared to African genes. You being white and marrying an Asian woman (wow, who would have guessed nerdy white guys obssesed with Asian women on a Bitcoin forum???) doesn't really have anything to do with what I typed. There's plenty of half white, half asian girls that can pass for full white or full asian. Neither group's traits completely obliterate the others making one of the participants seemingly function only as junk DNA.
You still have no idea how recessive and dominant genes work. Maybe you should do some reading. And stop being an asshole.
No, I think you have no idea how anything works, keep trying to push your cultural Marxism though, claiming everyone that walks the earth is identical little clones. Every group is different from both physical and behavioral aspects, because that is the purpose of evolution, to create differences, not to create Marxism. You should really go join the fiat world where your delusional view is commonplace.
Who said anything about little clones? The children of born of mixed couples are far more varied genetically than the offspring that result inbreeding small groups. Such children are about as far from little clones as you can get.
You seem to be confusing "racial purity" with genetic diversity when such purity is in fact the polar opposite of diversity. If anyone is closer to a "little clone" it is small groups wall themselves off genetically refuse to consider mates beyond their local group. Such inbreeding allows both recessive traits and recessive diseases to cluster. When this happens you will see more pure ebony Africans and more blond blue eyed Europeans but you will also see more sickle cell anemia and more familial dysautonomia (recessive diseases of Africans and Ashkenazi Jews respectively)