Re: [ANN][DASH] Dash | First Anonymous Coin | Inventor of X11, DGW, Darksend and InstantX
Dash 
That's because there was no vote. Just more lies from your full-time defender tantestefana2
Hello everyone and happy Friday!
Anyone who's been around long enough knows nothing in Darkcoin is ever set in stone and we listen to the community. Last time we removed the block halving we received a lot of crap, here's the problems with yearly halving.
- It's too fast and could destroy the coin
- It's way too much (50% per year)
- We already have formula for controlling the supply
Problems with not having a fixed supply:
- We'll have a constant amount of inflation forever. Most of us are in the austrian camp of economics, so I'd like to fix this.
In true Darkcoin fashion, I'd like to propose a solution that no other crypto has and fixes all of the issues. A yearly reduction of supply of 20%. With this we'll hit the cap of coins near 2056. I'm guessing we'll have somewhere near 25M coins (12M minimum, 49M maximum. Depends on how many miners we attract).
Let's have a vote!
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=525093.0
Anyone who's been around long enough knows nothing in Darkcoin is ever set in stone and we listen to the community. Last time we removed the block halving we received a lot of crap, here's the problems with yearly halving.
- It's too fast and could destroy the coin
- It's way too much (50% per year)
- We already have formula for controlling the supply
Problems with not having a fixed supply:
- We'll have a constant amount of inflation forever. Most of us are in the austrian camp of economics, so I'd like to fix this.
In true Darkcoin fashion, I'd like to propose a solution that no other crypto has and fixes all of the issues. A yearly reduction of supply of 20%. With this we'll hit the cap of coins near 2056. I'm guessing we'll have somewhere near 25M coins (12M minimum, 49M maximum. Depends on how many miners we attract).
Let's have a vote!
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=525093.0
Now what about gtfy?
This shows how Evan thought the hash rate would be more in the center, but this project was uber popular and we've been hugging the bottom emissions rate just about this whole time. Also, note, after much more discussion, the reduction of supply was lowered to 7% as I think Evan's calculations were a bit off, and it turns out to be far more gentle.