I have an accusation thread here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1256710.0Another thread in meta here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1258103.0To put everything into a nutshell of what happened instead of reading my previous thread:
I lent a user named "jadens" some bitcoin and he offered me his Sr. member account as collateral. The strange thing is that another person named "RKen" claims that the account was his and it was hacked -
he PMed me the day after the loan has been funded. Which leads me to question how he found out that the account was in my hands and he couldn't give any explanation other than "that's my account and I know where it is".
He wants his account back but doesn't want to contact the admins after I wanted the staff members to check the IPs between jadens and RKen.
To come to a conclusion, I think the whole thing was a plotted scam, which I have never seen or experienced before.
Many asked for a signed message, which I unfortunately don't have... And please don't post any spam posts like:"Why didn't you ask for a signed message?" - that's exactly my problem right now and I know it.
The repayment date of the loan is November 24th
So my question is:
May I sell the account after the repayment date has been passed or should I hold the account until the whole thing gets settled, but by doing that I would have lost my btc and have a bct account that I cannot use.
What's the opinion of you guys?
Unless Rken proves that his account was indeed hacked and that he and jadens are not the same person, you are justified in doing what you want with the account, including selling it. But I doubt if you would be able to sell the account at a reasonable price, if you don't have a signed message.
You would ethically need to make a full disclosure to the buyer.
Even if RKen does prove that he and jadens are not the same person, you are not totally at a loss. Ask him to stand behind the actions of his account and pay up.
think that marcotheminer should return the account now since it was probably hacked, but everyone should give yussuf89 negative feedback for being unable to stand behind his account's actions unless he pays 50-75% of the loan principle. (This is just my opinion -- I'm not going to try to enforce it.)