Here is my most recent paper [link]. Can you explain your theory in more detail? It sounds like you're suggesting that I didn't write it, yet there are many people who know that I did such as Prof. Wilmer from U Pitt, Prof. Bivar from George Washington U, contributors in Cypherdoc's thread, and other people here in Vancouver. Suddenly, your "conspiracy theory" that other people are writing my papers and paying me to give talks about them [link], as well as funding VeritasSapere to post comments here gets pretty bizarre. Is everybody else "in on it" too?
The truth is that the majority of the community recognizes that bigger blocks are needed for further adoption and we're all working hard in whatever ways we can to make that happen. However, due to the censorship in online discussion, both sides of the debate are surrounded by a mist of mistrust.
This tells me nothing and is worthless evidence to almost everyone in the world. It's not my conspiracy theory. The right people have been discussing this occasionally since "you" released it. Every time you do something ignorant, like call out to censorship because the forum doesn't agree with your nonsense, you start looking more like a clown. The owner of a forum has every right to delete, punish and whatnot anyone who comes to their forum for no apparent reason. This is not censorship, this is him/her not wanting to listen to your bullshit. The right to free speech has nothing to do with a forum. The truth is that the majority of the community recognizes that bigger blocks are needed for further adoption and we're all working hard in whatever ways we can to make that happen. However, due to the censorship in online discussion, both sides of the debate are surrounded by a mist of mistrust.
Obviously the lack of trust is deserved. A possible analogy: a warrior should drop his shield (spam filter, e.g. block size) for X reason and go into a fight hoping that everything will be alright. I wonder what would happen the next time we have a spam attack, 100 times stronger than we've had so far, if we followed your proposal. Should we risk everything in order to find out, hoping that everything will be right?
Update:
XT propaganda folk doesn't know the definition of freedom of speech. "Freedom of speech is the right to communicate one's opinions and ideas without fear of government retaliation or censorship." This is obviously the case here since theymos is the government.
