is there a TL;DR?
I have not kept up with the overly long debate of "Dah Blohk Seyez"
thanks
Big Blockers : Artificial block size limit relies on a central authority decision on limit vs market dynamics. Undermines the proposition of being able to transact on chain, contrary to philosophy of "being able to send payments without going through a financial institution". Anyone that disagrees is a moron set to destroy bitcoin.
Small Blockers : Increasing block size makes it i) harder to run a node, ii) favours big miners, both of which increase centralisation. Anyone that disagrees is a moron set to destroy bitcoin.
Here is a new one...
Neutral Blockers - got pop corn and gonna wait for the fireworks to ensue without wasting time with the back and forth of a time and resource wasting debate.