If there were a salvation advantage in other so-called gospels, they would be in the Bible.
I do not wish to surrender my discernment to any one set of texts, that is totally irrational.
I would FAR rather READ IT ALL and judge in wisdom of knowledge. That is called "using God's gift of reason".
According to YOU, ANYTHING could be in the Bible and it is still valid, even if it is a LIE added by man.
You are using fallacious thinking known as post-hoc reasoning. You have faith in something (i.e. that the Bible is inerrant) and it clouds your reasoning, so you make false claims/arguments without first seeing if the premises are correct (they are not).
You do not examine the possibility that the true cause of those books being in the Bible is that the Church of Rome wanted them in there. Satan is not MY buddy because I RECOGNIZE that these books are promoted by the adversary. Do you?
It's kinda fun, isn't it?... picking on each other.
As I said before, since the Bible says that we are gods to whom the Word of God comes, and you expressed at some point that the PJs express similar (without the "to whom the Word of God comes" part), we, the Christians, are using our god-power to make the God of the Bible to be supreme God over all... that is, if He isn't already
.Read it and weep. You'll never catch up.
