Re: [ANN][DASH] Dash | First Anonymous Coin | Inventor of X11, DGW, Darksend and InstantX
let's play the coins game 
as if the instamine was not enough..evan and his crew still want to compete with the GPU miners and milk darkcoin with their CPU amazon EC2 miners...no need to cripple miners..lets just cripple darkcoin code and favor CPU.
masternodes concept was posted in feb 21 2014 ..how early was was it in their minds?january 2014? hmmm.
coins emitted february 14, 2014 is 3,276,169
coins now November 30, 2015 is 6M
right now masternodes are still competing with GPU mining for coins......up until now only stupid people are mining.
how many coins did they get? a fuckin LOT
now.. the fishy game
***check the circle jerk guys' date registered..they may have created these new accounts for dash.like Minotaur26(feb 2014), bigr(jan 2014) lebubar(feb 2014) oblox(april 2014) tantestefana (first account) (jan 2014) BagHolder010 (aug 2014) ceti (april 2014)...all first post darkcoin..there maybe others or others that did not created new account/s.
no wonder vertoe is asking..who the hell are these guys?....the foundation members...etc
There's no ideology in something that nobody uses. The ideology's in the design, not the name. Vertoe is justified in leaving over not being consulted but less so over 'ideology'.
It's not a rock song that's being built here it's electronic money.
The name can easily be compromised without any loss of principle but the functionality can't. So Evan has got his priorities right in that regard.
no.
i left because i disagree darkcoin or however it will be called next year is not a decentralized entity. it never was but i ignored it as long as darkcoin was following the same path i was following. the path to total financial privacy. and thats why i am so upset about how this currency is lead by a single person. darkcoin is like an old conservative company with strong hierarchical comamnd structures and a single person on the top of the pyramid. evan duffield. the rebranding using a detergent name was just a step forward in creating something like apple or paypal. fuck this i tell you. what we need is a trustless, decentralized and anonymous currency. darkcoin is not decentralized as it still relies on a single person. and this reaches deep into the code base.
the core devs were just a bunch of volunteers exploited for the big thing. the extended darkcoin team was the same with even a lower place to sit on that pyramid. and what was the darkcoin foundation again? right, something to reserve some rights on some names and collect money. who nominated and voted for the foundation board? who does even know who are these guys? how did we learn about the foundation? from local news papers! the team listings kept counting names of people nobody ever noticed before. and they never committed anything visible to the community or the repository. and i was spending 25 hours a day monitory everything that happened in the darkcoin community for more than a year. the things going on here are fishy, intransparent and rely on a single entity.
i will get out and and will contribute to something decentralized and anonymous. i always hoped darkcoin could fill that void. i cant blame anyone to stay with this project. you are probably investors trying to win a gold donkey. or you are simply trying to exploit every possible vector of profit in the coins space. whatever. you are not here because darkcoin is something it claims to be.
if you disagree with my statement above, i dont care, but answer that simple question: what if evan duffield suddenly announces he quits the project tomorrow morning?
good luck
vertoe was used in my opinion/theory......the big thing?
question: what is the exit strategy for the big thing? 100 million $ 200 million $ ....mark karpeles choose millions of $ gotcha
gonna sleep now in the other side of the globe...good morning there.
as if the instamine was not enough..evan and his crew still want to compete with the GPU miners and milk darkcoin with their CPU amazon EC2 miners...no need to cripple miners..lets just cripple darkcoin code and favor CPU.
masternodes concept was posted in feb 21 2014 ..how early was was it in their minds?january 2014? hmmm.
coins emitted february 14, 2014 is 3,276,169
coins now November 30, 2015 is 6M
right now masternodes are still competing with GPU mining for coins......up until now only stupid people are mining.
how many coins did they get? a fuckin LOT
now.. the fishy game
***check the circle jerk guys' date registered..they may have created these new accounts for dash.like Minotaur26(feb 2014), bigr(jan 2014) lebubar(feb 2014) oblox(april 2014) tantestefana (first account) (jan 2014) BagHolder010 (aug 2014) ceti (april 2014)...all first post darkcoin..there maybe others or others that did not created new account/s.
no wonder vertoe is asking..who the hell are these guys?....the foundation members...etc
So yes there is ideology behind this coin : privacy, liberty, freedom, try to make the world less directed by "power" and more with the heart...
I hope that changing the name will not make the ideology behind it change too, otherwhise it will failed.
I hope that changing the name will not make the ideology behind it change too, otherwhise it will failed.
There's no ideology in something that nobody uses. The ideology's in the design, not the name. Vertoe is justified in leaving over not being consulted but less so over 'ideology'.
It's not a rock song that's being built here it's electronic money.
The name can easily be compromised without any loss of principle but the functionality can't. So Evan has got his priorities right in that regard.
no.
i left because i disagree darkcoin or however it will be called next year is not a decentralized entity. it never was but i ignored it as long as darkcoin was following the same path i was following. the path to total financial privacy. and thats why i am so upset about how this currency is lead by a single person. darkcoin is like an old conservative company with strong hierarchical comamnd structures and a single person on the top of the pyramid. evan duffield. the rebranding using a detergent name was just a step forward in creating something like apple or paypal. fuck this i tell you. what we need is a trustless, decentralized and anonymous currency. darkcoin is not decentralized as it still relies on a single person. and this reaches deep into the code base.
the core devs were just a bunch of volunteers exploited for the big thing. the extended darkcoin team was the same with even a lower place to sit on that pyramid. and what was the darkcoin foundation again? right, something to reserve some rights on some names and collect money. who nominated and voted for the foundation board? who does even know who are these guys? how did we learn about the foundation? from local news papers! the team listings kept counting names of people nobody ever noticed before. and they never committed anything visible to the community or the repository. and i was spending 25 hours a day monitory everything that happened in the darkcoin community for more than a year. the things going on here are fishy, intransparent and rely on a single entity.
i will get out and and will contribute to something decentralized and anonymous. i always hoped darkcoin could fill that void. i cant blame anyone to stay with this project. you are probably investors trying to win a gold donkey. or you are simply trying to exploit every possible vector of profit in the coins space. whatever. you are not here because darkcoin is something it claims to be.
if you disagree with my statement above, i dont care, but answer that simple question: what if evan duffield suddenly announces he quits the project tomorrow morning?
good luck
vertoe was used in my opinion/theory......the big thing?
question: what is the exit strategy for the big thing? 100 million $ 200 million $ ....mark karpeles choose millions of $ gotcha
gonna sleep now in the other side of the globe...good morning there.