I speak on for myself, I do not design with 1pt because it takes too much time effort to colour code each "bit" leaving too little time to design the rest of the signatures.
Hello,
So it's a good thing that you don't waste your time on 1pt size characters for signatures:
Example : previous works made by Coinnosaurus:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=360915 <- His signature was "made" by Coinnosaurus.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1173574.msg12401386#msg12401386Please check his work under different browsers like Opera, Mozilla, Chrome.
Now, do you all understand why we
SHOULD NOT use 1pt characters for BBCode Signatures around the Bitcoin Talk Forum?
I already made such things but this don't looks good under the
MOST of web browsers.
For example I used 1pt size characters for this design: (armchair icon)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1001536.msg10939294#msg10939294And I even mentioned about the problem and showed screenshots. Then I was checking under Opera and Chrome.
Best regards.
I had no idea what you were talking about, when you first mentioned about not using the 1pt character in the bbcodes but I checked your example of "Nexus" sig above and I see now what you're talking about.
Firefox:-

Chrome:-

It is very weird, don't know what exactly causes this but FF ate the Niro part for some reason. Don't use opera, so don't know how it looks there.
But that being said, it does
not mean that he designed this one using 1pt character also, if his sig looks good in ff and chrome, which are the most used browsers then it should be considered a valid entry.