(...)
Ignoratio Elenchi.
Ignoratio Elenchi, according to Aristotle, is a fallacy which arises from ignorance of the nature of refutation. In order to refute an assertion, Aristotle says we must prove its contradictory; the proof, consequently, of a proposition which stood in any other relation than that to the original, would be an ignoratio elenchi
For instance, instead of proving that this person has committed an atrocious fraud, you prove that this fraud he is accused of is atrocious;
The nature of the fallacy, then, consists in substituting for a certain issue another which is more or less closely related to it, and arguing the substituted issue.
The subject in discussion is about Goat's banishment, not what you fictionally assume about my character.
Do your own research if you want to read the posts where he took issue with Theymos.
I do my own research:
I decided that he harms discussions too much to be allowed to continue. He posts more than Atlas and his posts are of lower quality. When he argues about something, he ignores all of the arguments of his opponents and just repeats the same nonsense over and over. I suspect that he may be intentionally trying to stir up drama in order to hurt the forum and the community.
The ban will not expire automatically. I may review it later.
Goat's gone off the deep end lately, you can't reason with him at all. Warnings won't work he'll just troll about that too.
He needed a break from the forums.
So, where is your evidence which demonstrates that the user Goat was banned solely because he/she criticized Theymos? You just have fallacious assumptions like this?
Well he didn't get banned before he criticized Theymos on the forums, did he?
Because event A did not happened, it not means event B happened.