great to have you onboard and thanks for the offer of the OFFS, we can certainly look into a way of adding them into the structure.
I was thinking in regards to the new coin we could burn barr? (slightly ironic but hear me out)
everyone exchanges barr into the new coin and then you are allocated a share of the new coin to run the exact same project that you have ran very well so far with barr (the burning rates you have achieved so far is impressive) you get to clear up the altcoin industry and on top of that you have other people developing new features and ideas for the new coin giving and creating its value, does that sound like something we could do?
Do you mean fully merging BARR into Cerium? That would be complicated.
You're only exchanging altcoins for Cerium one time, during December; is that correct?
And you're also doing an ICO? So if we were to get rid of BARR and continue doing the same thing with Cerium, we'd need a fund of pre-mined coins?
But will the coin still use sha256 PoW? The way BARR currently operates uses Multi-Proof-of-Burn as the only method of generating coins, and our methods might not be compatible with a simultaneous ongoing generation of coins through PoW.
But there could be more than one way our projects could work together.
the merger would be to a new codebase with cerium being one of the coins being swapped for it. The ICO may not happen, only if the new coins core team decides on one for funds for projects but im hoping thats not the case. and i would be happy to allocate a premine for the burning process. I'm trying to gather up all the interested coins on our new slack group (details on
) so we can accomodate as many of the features the merger coins had into one. We've currently got about 4/5 other coins we are discussing it with too.