It's a logical conclusion. If Jinn assets are "*NOT* an investment" and after a certain date they aren't redeemable IOTA which the CEO claims is "NOT a cryptocurrency", what are they?
Go back to the forum you were just banned from and read the thread, everyone else got it.
Everybody else didn't get it. Other people have pointed out that you are contradicting yourself and are confused.
How can you say that the "terms haven't changed even once", when you are now stating that what people purchased should "not be considered an investment or a cryptocurrency" when you sold it to them as "profit-shares"?