Looks like runpaint told the truth. No sense bickering about it, let's move on and spend our time on other things.
Told the truth about what?
The things we're talking about.
He bought the AnarchistsPrime I and others where selling up to three weeks before the burn, we where all selling at 250 -400 sats and expected a pump to 600
So you were aware that BARR was going to raise the price to 600 and burn all the coins we acquired.
Before we can buy at 600, someone has to buy all coins being sold below 600. If no one else buys them, we buy them. If people keeping dumping huge amounts below 600, we have to come up with hundreds and hundreds of dollars to buy ACP, and that is what we did.
so as you'd know we had no idea he was collecting acp to burn
That contradicts what you just said. You just admitted that you were expecting BARR to raise the price to 600 as part of our burn exchange.
He has tried to vilify me in front of the bitcointalk forum and chat Trolbox after he not only said the the new wallets acp has are worse than the doom graphics in 98
93.
but he ran down steakcloud .
No he didn't.
It was very simple - he asked you and other ACP dumpers to back him up against BARR fudders, since you had been making money from BARR.
You were in C-Cex chat, chatting away and getting
BTC from runpaint, while someone was there saying that BARR was bad for ACP. You said nothing to correct that FUD.
runpaint thought he could easily clear up the matter, defend BARR and shut up the fudder, by asking you to confirm that BARR was the reason for ACP going from 60 sats to 600.
You refused to acknowledge what BARR had done for you, and you insisted that the price and volume of ACP went to the moon due to mining activity, steakcloud, and new wallets.
It turned into an attack against runpaint, with your investors saying runpaint was taking false credit for ACP's sudden success, with comments such as "I hate traders who think they make or break a coin."
Since he was being challenged, he stopped buying ACP. The next day the market volume for ACP was 0.00
BTC, proving him right and you wrong.
He asked if you guys had stopped mining and stopped doing steakcloud, since those were your explanations for the market activity.
You said investors paid 10 times the price for ACP because of your new wallet, and runpaint pointed out that the wallet doesn't look good enough to justify that. It has an animated gif of the coin logo rotating, with a big non-transparent white pixel orbiting the logo as if it was edited in MS Paint with no attention to detail.
It was a situation where we had to defend ourselves, and that's all we did.
runpaint asked you to back him up in saying that BARR had benefited ACP. You took that as an attack on ACP, so you attacked runpaint. He defended himself, and you took that as an attack. That's not what it was.
the above edited screenshots
If they're edited, why haven't you found any differences in the chat logs? Those screenshots show the truth.
It's not a big deal, no one is saying you did anything wrong. We're just saying BARR is the reason why ACP went to 600, which you now admit after all this arguing.