Veritas Sapere trying to simultaneously claim that:

• Economic majority got the wrong answer to the question of the blocksize increase
• The will of the economic majority should be respected
• Veritas Sapere can simply assert who the economic majority are and what their position is at any given time
• BIP101 is the worst scaling scheme
• BIP101 isn't such a bad scaling scheme
• Soft forks are a "disgusting" abuse of power
• Devs are free to implement soft forks as they please
• Veritas Sapere does not hold contradictory and/or hypocritical views

Any more, VS? It's an interesting list so far, is it possible that you could make it even more logically incoherent?