Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Gmaxwell proves Craig Wright is a fraud
by
keepdoing
on 09/12/2015, 15:50:03 UTC
Craig = Satoshi.  You can't fake most of the facts, and most of those facts fit.  AND the amount of innacurate information, exageration and FUD being propogated is growing so exponentially it is ridiculous.  This is all just conspiracy theory nonsense and drama because "Satoshi" was more fun to believe in as a purely idealistic vision - than to look at through the lens of reality.

Sort of like the whole Jesus concept.  If Jesus really were to come back, today, the first thing religion would do is beat the crap out of him and nail him up to another cross all the while screaming hysterically that he was an fraud.

LOL - same thing going on here.... Seems tech weenies are still just a step evolved above the apes, even with all your loft idealistic talk.  Your "Tech Jesus" has returned, and you scream to crucify him Smiley  Flippin monkeys.  Just when you think there is actual evolution occurring.  ROFL

LOL LOL - Oh the Hysteria Smiley


Your wrong, in crypto world you have to sign tx/message to prove ownership. He dont deliver this proof of course, you should question why and whether anybody else could claim the same as he did then.

Craig didn't just claim he was Satoshi.  He has NOT publically claimed to be Satoshi.  It is "discovery" of old posts/emails etc in which he privately admitted it to others in the very early days.  But he NEVER said he was Satoshi in the video, or in any recent communication, and has NEVER done so publically.  The media and the hyped out spreading disinformation trying to paint Craig as a glory seeker have done that.

What is apparent is that the EVIDENCE and the FACTS we have so far are leading to the conclusion Craig = Satoshi.  And it is being compiled without his involvement.   The other thing that is perfectly apparent is that IF the evidence and facts uncovered so far is correct, then every bit of it also points to the fact that he desires privacy, and is pissed that his "gift given freely" somehow creates a thought process in the general monkey population that he is somehow now indebted to you for having given you a gift, and that you have earned the right to destroy his privacy and life.  F%^$ing Selfish Losers.

And yes, he should have known that monkeys will be monkeys true to their nature.  Selfish little prigs.  And yet he grew a bannana tree for you, even though he knew you would just whine for more.

And with all that said.... in ALL worlds, he does NOT have to verify a damn thing to you.