Re: What the Return of Satoshi (aka Craig Wright) really means?
He's not Satoshi
Prove that uncategorically. Oh, and please try to stay on topic 
I thought I covered that in the OP. It's sort of an intellectual discussion. Are you qualified to participate?Certainly a reply worthy of an intellectual.
-snip-
Lets put the Craig is not Satoshi discussion aside indeed and focus on more important things.
But putting that aside, and assuming that anyone emerged under the existing and above scenario (lets just PRETEND Craig = Satoshi) - what might it mean for the direction of bitcoin? Any Comments? Or is the bee's nest still buzzing too angrily to begin intelligent discussion?
If anyone would reemerge as Satoshi it would be bad for bitcoin in my opinion. Why? Because people would constantly ask for Satoshi's opinion while it us our job to find the best solution. They already are whenever there is a problem, people go back and find satoshi quotes instead of argueing the point at hand. The best solution can not be found by a single person, but by a multitude of persons discussing and weighing proposals.