yep 76 is a 50% slow down for neo scrypt from 586 to 234
and quark is up 1.04 % from 17206 to 17972
time to run two folders
Has anyone compiled r76 for sm5.2 using cuda 6.5 (windows or linux to do a direct comparison with cuda 7.5?
I could only do it with 750ti's on Linux and there was virtually no difference.
Edit: however, they were both slower than 1.5.74-cuda6.5.
The numbers (gpu0/gpu1) both EVGA 750ti SC no OC.
1.5.74(6.5) 1.5.76(6.5) 1.5.76(7.5)
x11 3090/3145 2985/3050 2980/3045
quark 6360/6450 6335/6380 6340/6400
lyra2v2 4715/4755 4680/4715 4680/4715
What a pain getting this to display correctly, this ain't WYSIWYG.
im compiling the the latest as we speak ... i was well enough to drive - so im here in the office at the moment ...
the only thing i can give a comparison rate to is quark ( from 74 - 76 ) on c7.5 ...
that doesnt exactly hep what you are asking - but it may be of interest to you regarding the last compiles i had with fedora ...
btw - i have upgraded to fedora23x64 on the test machine - and compiling with c7.5 and ccminer-spmod76 ...
it is this test machine i will be placing to mine for sp as a donation ... so if all is well - it should be a nice gain - unless fedora / cuda is broken in this version ... if not - im looking forward to some gains ... and sp - expect some hashrate on the donation link for you ...
#crysx