Post
Topic
Board Reputation
Re: Shorena - To -ve reped and removed from default trust
by
Quickseller
on 13/12/2015, 15:37:26 UTC
shorena had made an argument defending his decision to keep his signature up (at the time) in that he believed that they were not a scam. In fact, he made such argument in a very post that you quoted, and such argument was the only thing that you sniped.

--snip--

I will post my arguments here.

I had coins invested with dicebitco.in and was able to completly divest and withdraw.
Manl and Gerry paid out everyone (to my knowledge) that lost coins.
Those that have not been paid out are those that won coins. I think that is acceptable as they have more than they had before the incident and thus did not lose anything. While you can argue that the rolls are deterministic the gamblers are not, thus it makes no sense to argue in hindsight if and what they players would have risked would the nounces not have been skipped.

--snip--
Although I disagree with his reasoning and his conclusion, I believe that his statement shows a lack of malice in advertising that scam. I also find it reasonable for someone to believe what shorea said in the quoted post.

With your signature on the other hand, it is simply not possible for that ponzi to not eventually end up scamming it's players.

edit:

Why are you wasting your time being butthurt over this though? Simply remove the scam sig you have now and move on to another legitimate campaign - problem solved.
I suspect that the OP might be slightly more involved in that scam then participating in it's signature campaign Wink