#1 this should be in reputation. no, has to do with default trust
#2 thanks quickseller for what? disregarding evidence and picking sides?
#3 thanks for giving me a chance to answer to the PM: you're welcome, i'm a pretty fair guy
No, the negativ rating is for promoting a ponzi. I will remove it if you remove the signature before you get paid. You probably just misread that. you didnt remove yours when you were promoting that scam, you waited for the money, why should I ?
#4 Again, I am not a God and I never claimed to be one. If you want to worship me, fine. I will probably not listen to your prayers though.
#5 The person that put me in this position is BadBear.
#6 I cant and I wont be able to go against all scams. Argueing why I dont go against something else you consider a scam is not helping you in discussion. Its not relevant. If you think there are known scams that needs tagging from someone from default trust. ~snip~
its not considered a scam, it is a scam
#7 My advertising for dicebitco.in has been explained at length. I might have been wrong about them, but to my knowledge they paid out everyone and closed shop. You might also notice that I still wear the rating I got for it. wrong
#8 When I had doubt about a casino I advertised for I left the campaign and waived payment. They turned out to be honest.
oh, when you have doubts you leave, but when its a proven scam you stay?
@EcuaMobi: Yes I kept wearing the signature after it turned out they skipped nonces. The full story is that they also repaid those affected by skipped nonces. Firstly only those that lost, but later everyone else. The story was that they hired a 3rd person that patched in the skipped nonces, did a mistakes as they did not review the code before it went live. I can look up the relevant threads later if you want.
#2 For congratulating me on my first drama thread. Im not very fond of it though.
#6 I think you missed the point. The point is I am not everywhere, nor do I try to be. Im out of cloud mining since hashie.
#7 wrong what? I have the feeling you dont want me to take you seriously.
#8 It was meant as an example that I am not perfect. I am not entirely sure I would make the same decision I did with dicebitco.in again. Should have could have is however not something I want to have a part in. I made my decision and if it turns out that I now deserve a negative rating for it, so be it.
@EcuaMobi:
This[1] is the thread Stunna openend when the skipped nonces happened. It includes a link[2] to the dicebitco.in main thread when the first people notices some "bug". I can give you some highlighty, but its probably better if you read up on your own after that. I dont want to influence your decision by cherry picking quotes. IIRC the campaign was run by the same two people running the casino. I joined september[3]. Mitchell and dooglus as escrow took over the campaign[4]. As you can see from the posts by the escrows it was not clear whether it was a scam or not. After some arguments have been passed Mitchell decided to pay out a large portion and let doog handle the rest[5]. Eventually the owners paid out on 1st Oct. The same day there was another claim that they are scamming as doog confirms here[6]. Whether or not I was still wearing the signature at that time I dont know.
[1]
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=774120.0[2]
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=716312.msg8715769#msg8715769[3]
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=758854[4]
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=776227[5]
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=778953.0[6]
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=716312.msg9057104#msg9057104