What I can't understand if the email was hacked and all the evidence was shown from the satoshi vistomail account. Then why from the same vistomail account did he then deny being Satoshi.
Fuck, one of these days I wish Maria6.0 would explain all this to me.
There is no proof in the article. There's plenty of circumstantial evidence and hints, but no proof. In contrast, there is absolute proof that some of their evidence was forged.