Re: CRYPTSY stopping withdraw locking accounts without notifying users! Class Action
"Knock knock!"
"Who's there?"
"Cryptsy's intimate connection."
"Cryptsy's intimate connection to who?"
"Cryptsy's intimate connection to the Garza family and Paycoin scam may be of much interest to the SEC since they are taking Josh Garza to court over scamming people out of approximately $20,000,000.00 with his mining contracts shared profit scam.
They may also take an interest in the fact that Cryptsy.com users are waiting weeks, even months for a few hundred dollars in Bitcoin, yet some wacko peonminer proved that their Cryptsy.com-old and new wallets are shuffling thousands of dollars of Bitcoin to a rogue wallet, which is then sent to a $6,000,000.00 address that is appeared to be used in mixing Bitcoins.
They may also be interested in the privy information that may be connecting that mixing address to the Scryptsy scam and another HYIP scam that has recently popped up."
"Oh. Um. Yeah. Don't come in. We have no idea what you're talking about. All of those connections are probably wrong. I'm not sure, but it just doesn't make sense. I would think someone would have caught that by now. Just come back In Two Weeks. Mein Fuhrer should be back from China then. By the way, his visit to China has nothing to do with www.bitebi9.com so stop digging, um, I mean, knocking. Oh, and if the SEC asks, you never heard of Scryptsy.com or Mintsy.com . . . understood? I mean, we don't have a clue about those sites either."
So again from my view on working inside Cryptsy the Garza thing just isn't a path as far as Paul. There were some talks but mostly related to InsideBTC in Las Vegas and him wanting to be a part of Cryptsy. That never happened. Can't speak much to Marshall he was there about 5-6 months before he left. As far as the SEC Marshall Long being CTO was not a secret. Honestly most of the stuff you guys are talking about is available to them. I know on the paycoin thing action was taken not sure on the legalities of me speaking to it at this point. When I was at Cryptsy the Fincen stuff was a pain in the ass because its actually illegal for them to comment if someone did something.
I saw lots of posts when I was there where a guy would say his stuff is frozen etc. 99% of the time it was he was flagged and reported to Fincen. But the stupid law says you cant tell them that. It was a painful restriction. So lets say a company did something wrong who was a customer it was likely filed as a SAR. The big downfall with that is Cryptsy couldn't say hey yeah its fucked up so we reported it to Fincen. As that would be considered informing someone they were under investigation. At least my understanding.
I'll add I definitely don't think the current issues are SAR related lol. Unless the system started flagging all users.
As far as what your saying Peon. I don't work there don't really care I'm just telling folks what I know from being an insider within the bounds of the NDA I signed. There are plenty of folks working there who would be all over it if that was the case (at least my opinion) and they would not stay.