This is being discussed extensively in this thread:
https://bitco.in/forum/threads/gold-collapsing-bitcoin-up.16/page-200You are welcome to join us in there and we would love to hear your constructive criticisms, through this process we can all improve our understanding of the Bitcoin protocol. To start you off I would specifically recommend you to read these two papers which empirically attempt to prove that this game-theoretic block size limit does exist.
You're trying to tell me that you are promoting a software alternative with undecided features? This makes sense. I don't have time to read so much in another forum. Summary or tl;dr is needed.
So if I write a paper that makes what I say true? I thought you knew better.
I do not see a counter argument here, I get the feeling that you are not interested in engaging in constructive discussion. I have already explained how Bitcoin unlimited works, it is actually relatively simple. The feature set has already been decided upon, in the future more features will most likely be added. We even have a formal decision making process in place which I would argue is actually superior to Core.
http://www.bitcoinunlimited.info/articlesOfFederation