Of course, if he has issued a further statement, I'd be happy to read it.
Incidentally: appeal to authority?
Your post is wrong. People in this discussion have become very deluded throwing fallacies around like they're candy. Naming the source of something means that I'm appealing to authority? Incidentally: appeal to authority?
I see that you are trying to build in the mind the reader the impression that Gavin has declared that the BU codebase has resulted in a faulty executable program. Unless Gavin has issued further input to the BU review, you are mischaracterizing his statement. Nothing i have read in his comments would support that position.
You can easily see what Gavin wrote a few posts back in this thread.