Again, thanks a lot for the free insult most charming gentleman.
This community...
And the "fucking simpleton" advises you to think a bit more about the LEGAL definition of escrow and what's needed for it. We're talking about filing a case, so the question is not what you BELIEVE an escrow is, but can master-p be legally considered as an escrow and what are his obligation as one. Under the law. Not for your useless opinion.
Think more, insult less. Kiss.
He migth not be an escrow in the fully legal status of his country but what remains is that an escrow takes funds that he knows belongs to other people. It was no present, the contract is clearly defined and even written down in private messages. So at least it is clear that the escrow has the obligation to pay the funds either back, when the deal goes wrong or forwards them to the seller when the buyer agrees.
Next thing is... the story now is "Hacker". With all the logic holes in this story he would have a real hard time at court to proove that actually a hacker would be involved.
By the way... why are you so involved in this? Fighting the "community" for getting angry about inconsistencies in the storyline? And i have to admit that your accusations against the bitcoin community remind me a lot of master-P.
What's in it for you?