What? What logic is there in that statement? Because the real Master-P guessed that the hacker didn't move the coins because he can't access them any longer, this some how proves he did it? Grow a brain first, then speculate. I am not taking him at his word, I am taking the most likely avenue for resolution for the victims.
feisty, aren't we today
the supposed hacker could not POSSIBLY know that Master-P doesn't have access to the wallet
it doesn't make any sense and has been pointed out by multiple posters already
also Master-P conveniently deleting all backups prior to the hack is also not something the supposed hacker could have planned for framing Master-P
there are a couple of other holes like not reporting the hack for two weeks while playing csgo for many hours
clearly your the one speculating here that someone framed Master-P when all facts point in the other direction
Your right, how could a hacker know he already changed the wallet password? There is a difference between circumstantial evidence and direct evidence. Circumstantial evidence is not always reliable, but can be a good indicator. The problem is you are treating it like it is solid proof of something. It's not. BTW, this easily could just be about the perp covering his ass by making you all think you have the real perpetrator he set up as a patsy, allowing him to walk with no one even looking for him. Once again I will repeat myself. I don't believe Master-P, and IT DOESN'T MATTER HOW FULL OF SHIT HE IS. He has been positively identified and he will be held liable for the lost funds no matter what. If the funds are actually returned is another matter. If he is harassed and prosecuted the chances of that happening go way down. So put your drama boner away for a few days and see what he does ok sherlock? You will all get your pound of flesh. Let the actual victims try to recover some of their funds first before you bust your drama load all over the forum k?
P.S. Meltdown? Please. You give yourself too much credit.