Then maybe it's time to revisit. Anyone care to read this thread and summarize.
Summary:
puppet said Usagi falsified navs, conveniently forgetting to mention that the spreadsheets in question explicitly state that all numbers are approximations. Then usagi redoes the spreadsheets to pull data directly off the GLBSE, and puppet/EB/etc cry foul again stating that usagi is using an unfair/biased formula. So usagi redoes the spreadsheets a third time,
backed by shareholder motions, using both formulas and allowing investors to make their own decision about how to value the shares. The trolls go bananas and everyone starts to realize no, usagi is not a scammer, and the trolls are just dicks. Then GLBSE shuts down and "therefore usagi is a scammer".
Unfortunately there are some people here who think they can say anything they want and that being anonymous on the internet will protect them. You just have to put up with their shit, I guess.
This. The numbers weren't so much "approximations" as they were "pure fantasy" or "blatant falsehoods".
I have no idea if you were doing mark-to-fantasy with the intention of defrauding your customers, or if you just really thought that your assets were worth that much. I will say that you were very inconsistent about how you did your accounting, which suggests, but does not prove, that you knew something wasn't right. Many people were pointing out the widening gulf between your numbers and the mark-to-market numbers, which
should have made you sit down and take a hard, honest look at everything. Instead, you doubled down and got defensive about your bullshit valuations.
I haven't seen any
conclusive proof of malice, so I don't think a scammer tag is justified. But I sure won't ever invest in anything that you are involved with.