So first you were saying it was IMPOSSIBLE for you to use pregenerated hashes:
You are just straight out lying now, you are claiming we can use pre-generated hashes. This is 100% FALSE
And now you are saying that it is possible so long as you are willing to pay a few dust fees?
We would first have to pay the 0.001 fee from blockchain then we would also need know the second it would be on blockchain.
It takes less than a second to get a transaction onto blockchain.info, so you know which second it will be there - it's the same second as you sent it to them.
So it seems this attack has gone from "impossible, 100% false" to "anyone can do it for 0.0001 BTC". Hmmm.
As you can see this is impossible.
Which bit is impossible? Affording the fee? Or sending a transaction at the right time?
Please post it public how the system is not provably fair, because just saying it means nothing.
OK. One more time:
The system is not provably fair because the site can affect the outcome of the game after the tickets have been bought by broadcasting pregenerated transactions at the right time, and deliberately selecting that transaction as the one that affects the selection of the winning ticket.
If you can show us any real proof i will gladly say your right, besides that you just sound like a troll. Clearly with the motivation to make us look bad and to make our competitor look good.
You want to see proof of what, exactly? Here are the main points:
1) you can generate transactions without broadcasting them
2) you can check the txid of those transactions before you broadcast them
3) once you know the number of satoshis bet, you can figure out which ticket would win for each transaction
4) so you can find out which of your 100 pregenerated transactions would make you win if it was picked
5) it takes less than a second to get a transaction picked up by blockchain.info
6) you have no way of proving which was the last transaction you saw on blockchain.info after the 30 seconds is up
7) you can pick any transaction that was shown on blockchain.info in the relevant second
Can you tell me which of those 7 points you need proof of? They all seem self-evident to me.
I have no reason to make any site look good. My interest is in making sure that sites which claim to be provably fair actually are. And yours isn't.