no not really. it never was.
Care to elaborate on that? What would qualify as 'development' for you?
There are plenty of coin projects in the industry which have undergone endless development, modification and hype, only for there to still be no commercial interest whatsoever, with trading activity being primarily derived from speculators and market manipulators.
We've often heard the statement that Bitcoin is a solution looking for a problem and while most within the cryptocurrency industry are sufficiently tech-savvy enough to recognise the revolutionary innovation that is blockchain technology, the real-world adoption of same is frustratingly slow outside of the few Fintech cages it has rattled, simply because most businesses don't yet know what it is or what to do with it.
In the case of this particular coin project, we have opted to work with the devs, be it through collaboration within the SuperNET environment during most of last year, or by way of continuing to pitch blockchain-technology-based solutions to non-Fintech industries while keeping an eye on 'long-term' (for this industry anyway) technologies which are proving themselves as inherently reliable in order to better gauge what can and cannot be realistically built upon, commercially-speaking. Having experimented with different functions and features for this coin's wallet, as most other altcoins do, it became clear that until a real-world implementation for any non-Bitcoin cryptocurrency were to be established, thereby bringing in a viable economic environment to its market, there is little point in creating more 'solutions looking for problems'.