Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][XDE] [100 ~Rare!] ~XDECOIN~ MANDATORY SWAP TO WALLET v6 April 15th @ C-CEX
by
marcetin
on 04/01/2016, 23:08:24 UTC
I will keep old XDE, after all happened to it XDE deserve it.
Although I would agree with takeover if it keep base specs of XDE but this with 1K coins and POS 200% make story totally different.
All that has nothing to do with XDE, it is new coin which try to use XDE community and fame for profit.

The problem is, the coin is literally dead with this actually situation! So Vegas bring in new life. You have to read the OP, to get the point, why 200%!

I can explain it to you, marcetin :-)

Greetz
Meta

My point is more from developer side not economical, XDE is first working rare stake coin, so changing that you change true nature of it.

I understand u, I hope you join our new XDE thread and discuss with us. XDE II will also be a very rare coin! But is this not a big opportunity to bring in life in the network? You cannot profit from a dead rare coin! Crypto is nothing, who can be collected like stamps...

Come to new thread and let us discussing there. I would appreciate it to see you there

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1310435.0





Well, again different approach, what is dead coin? Coin is not dead if there is more than two peers working. But in this case there are 11 connections https://bitnodes.net/node/185-69-55-225/ so how anyone can say it is dead coin. 3 peers work 24/7 which I can personally guarantee. Domain is expired ok, but that has nothing to do with coin and coins network which is working flawlessly.
I was not active here on forum last months so I had no idea what is happening and today I saw this and I must say I am totally unpleasantly surprised. That is not giving life to XDE but just using XDE for some money scheme where profit is guaranteed.

I will not discuss in other thread because we are discussing about XDE and it destiny and place to decide that is here in official thread which can not be closed by anyone unless mblados say so, which will never happen.

Sorry guys I really do not like this change from original code, if you were using same source not doing this with wallets and swap I would support. But in this case I can not.