I don't understand how Europeans decided it was a good idea to accept muslim immigrants and asylum seekers, refugees etc etc
can someone explain to me the thought process of how local Europeans and their governments decided being over run by muslims was a good strategy for the future of Europe?
I truly believe Islam is not compatible with democracy and the western world, but that is another debate.
The UN technically forced us too, along with the EU. It is not the religion that is corrupt, it is a small minority of extremist "Muslims". There is extremist groups of all faiths Islamism, Hindu, Catholocism/Christianity... ETC...
Neither the UN nor the EU can "force" on this issue. Europeans are largely accepting it, even celebrating it. But, eh, fuck them. Europeans will get what they deserve.
Regarding Islam, you sound like you've never studied it. The Jihadists are not a sign that Islam is "corrupt." The Jihadists are following the pure vision of Islam, as set out by their warrior prophet Mohammed. I'd challenge you to write a few paragraphs for yourself about when Mohammed lived and what he did. Then look up some sources and compare it to what you wrote. No offense, but most people (including most Muslims) know almost nothing about Islam and its founding.
Same with other religions. No one follows their religion to the letter. And they aren't unchangeable. Everyone ignores one part or another and has their interpretations. So you're basically agreeing with him. Most christians, muslims, etc moved on and are peaceful. Then there are extremists that haven't moved on. Or that follow only what they want of their religion.