You guys are forgetting a really important factor in your assessment of insolvency.
You guys do understand that not everyone in our service are BTC depositors right? When we have a withdraw from a person who has invested any alt coins to our service he gets those coins back, we do not give him the BTC value of his coins.
The only thing that matters when assessing solvency is whether your liabilities exceed your assets.
You write on your site that your liabilities are 126 BTC, and it appears that your assets are less than 40 BTC. That means that you are insolvent.
What am I missing? Some of your depositors deposited altcoins, and so you owe them altcoins? If so, why not list your liabilities as X BTC + Y NET or whatever?
A lot of POW biased people do not understand the work involved in Staking a basket of coins at the same time.
Maybe that's true, but why does it matter? People are questioning your solvency. Whether it is harder to manage 12 wallets than to manage 1 doesn't seem relevant to this question.
Why should a service that offers people recurring weekly income with no work involved on their part be limited to altcoin users?
It isn't, but again I don't think this is relevant. The most important question is whether stakeminers is solvent or not. It appears from the numbers you have published yourself that it is far from it. Is that the case?