Analysis and list of top big blocks shills (XT #REKT ignorers)
Just for the fun of it and for the sake of curiosity, let's compile the (seemingly unmistakable) evidence of shillery. The nature of some of the posters who inexplicably blindly support clearly-unsafe big blocks (8MB?? Unlimited?
), whether XT or BU (anything other than Core), in complete disregard for not only contrary evidence but plain facts, makes it very difficult to imagine that they could somehow be clueless fanboys with permanent blinders on and a penchant for absurd levels of sophistry...
From now on, if I may suggest, let's log/save/harvest/compile the strongest cases of inexplicable irrationality by the (suspected) shills, so that we can eventually make a crystal clear case for this idea that there are actually people employed by a group whose goal it is to destroy Bitcoin.
For now, dump your evidence and/or observations (or even just the case you feel showcases the most obvious shilling) in this thread! Preferrably concisely summarized, though the more detailed and hyperlinked the better.
To my mind, the most obvious case is VeritasSapere. What is the probability that this guy is not employed full-time by a group whose goal it is to destroy Bitcoin? The username itself seems like a clue.
), whether XT or BU (anything other than Core), in complete disregard for not only contrary evidence but plain facts, makes it very difficult to imagine that they could somehow be clueless fanboys with permanent blinders on and a penchant for absurd levels of sophistry...From now on, if I may suggest, let's log/save/harvest/compile the strongest cases of inexplicable irrationality by the (suspected) shills, so that we can eventually make a crystal clear case for this idea that there are actually people employed by a group whose goal it is to destroy Bitcoin.
For now, dump your evidence and/or observations (or even just the case you feel showcases the most obvious shilling) in this thread! Preferrably concisely summarized, though the more detailed and hyperlinked the better.
To my mind, the most obvious case is VeritasSapere. What is the probability that this guy is not employed full-time by a group whose goal it is to destroy Bitcoin? The username itself seems like a clue.