I didn't mean to change the topic, or call anyone out here, but the facts are the facts and I'm not going to hide them... The launch was bad, 1.85mil was mined in just the first 24 hours. Only a linux version was compiled, so very few people got a large chunk of this 1.85mil (1850 MNs)...
It is what it is...
there actually was a window miner compiled at the launch because something went wrong and the launch was delayed until it could be fixed. it was fixed and by then somebody had compiled the windows miner and people were using it. it's all documented in the first several pages.
after that is when the 48hr ~2mill instamine happened. the launch was not pretty but it seems to have worked it's self out now. no coin that i know of has had a perfect launch that was fairly distributed. definitely not btc and while ltc was a bit better distribution wise they still had a small instamine due to their code. that code was partially responsible for our instamine because we were based on ltc code at the time.
out of the 3 (btc, ltc and DASH) i would say ltc may have the fairest distribution but it's hard to say. there still weren't that many miners back then but way more than btc but not anywhere as many as DASH. there are several btc people that have 1mil+ btc including satoshi. illodine has said more people mined DASH the first day than mined btc the 1st year and from my research that sounds about right. no one really knows though.
with all the different variables in play it looks to me they all have about equal distribution with ltc #1 and DASH and BTC close behind. none of that distribution is "fair" in the big picture to the other 99% of the world population that does not own any crypto.