I'm not debating that higher temps won't affect the life of the card. I keep my card running at < 60C myself. I wouldn't dream of running them at 110C and wondering why they burnt out after 3 months.
However, the argument FOR the necessity of lower temps lost credibility when the same people posted stuff like this:
The other part has to do with the toxic fumes the card will emit at the higher temps. This never gets talked about because just like smog/pollution, cell phone radiation, GMOs ect., they are all supposed to be "safe".
It just sounds a little too panic-y, and sounds like you frequent conspiracy theory sites. The average person will not accept this as a valid argument.
Plzzz don't make assumptions about me.
Look at the ever increasing cancer and disease rates and wake up. Do you really believe your environment and food provided by these corporations is safe ?
You guys have no real arguement to make so you resort to labelling and lame jokes about tinfoil. Typical...
I'm only making assumption based off the information you've provided, and my only argument is that you're willy-nilly connection of seemingly unrelated events is no basis for an argument when it comes to GPU temps. You just somehow lumped high GPU temps to pollution, high cancer rates, and GMOs, with no explanation. First you were taking about GPUs emitting toxic fumes, and now you've jumped to "unsafe" food from "these corporations" with literally ZERO connections between the two (let alone even said which corporations you're referring to). I'm honestly completely lost by your thought process, and somehow I'm the bad guy for pointing out your complete lack of being able to form an coherent argument.
So please, explain how GPU or VRM temps in the 80-90C has ANYTHING to do with the food I'm digesting, or my aunt's battle with cancer.