right....I was talking about TRUE DECENTRALIZED fully collaterilized market pegged assets such as bitusd,bitbtc,bitgold backed by bts collateral and you gave me back that quote with brownies which is a User issued asset!!
Clearly you are a trolling here so no point for me to continue this discussion with you.. Unless you really have no idea between market pegged assets and User Issued Asset and have no idea what you are talking about here so I will be happy to explain you..
I think what DecentralizeEconomics says is that in the case of a scam there is no point to talk about technicalities such as "collaterilized market pegged assets" and "User Issued Asset", but that guy with the baseball bat could describes the situation a lot better than nonsensical technicalities. In fact, it is quite hilarious that when there is a complete collapse terms of price and nobody is interested in the Bitshares technology in the real world outside of this scam driven crypto universe, then you are talking about "collaterilized market pegged assets" and "User Issued Asset", like such nonsenses would really matter in a real world economic process. It's like selling worthless polar bear shit to Eskimos by promising that some day the polar bear shit will turn to gold and then start analysing the economy model behind the polar bear shit to gold transformation process. (I mean in the view of the sceptics like DecentralizeEconomics the Bitshare process is something like that)
I don't own Bitshares, but I always thought the tech is quite promising and (though I could be wrong) it seems to me Dan Larimer is quite a decent and honest man, he doesn't come cross as a scammer.
I don't say Bitshare is a scam, on the other hand I fully understand why DecentralizeEconomics is sceptical. Those many money collecting parties from the Bitshare crew raise the alarm of scam and it doesnt give a good name to crypto currencies general. Especially in this scam driven crypto excrement market where 99% of the projects are pure fraud. Yes, yes, it was delivered something and yes, software development cost money, however the sceptics would be less agitated if some tech would be delivered without constantly pulling money from the supporters pocket. I am sure you are aware that there are hundreds of successful open source projects in which the developers volunteer to contribute, but it seems the Bitshares team can't develop software without luring the supporters into questionable and not profitable investments ... and I can fully understand why many observers like DecentralizeEconomics think that's not cool.