Quote from: Bitcoin Forum
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.
You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.
Looks like he has stolen some code from my fork.
1-may-2015 (Djm34 release his optimized opensource neoscryopt miner)
here is my checkin 3-may-2015 (neoscrypt 7% faster):
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/commit/48072790339fc021f096e20765ed8cd03701c155
(release 49)
Here is his checkin 17-may-2015 (without crediting me):
https://github.com/djm34/ccminer-tpsp/commit/817bcae908684edfb3e4639b0af65968e87f244f
So some of my 10% faster optimalizations has already been included.
You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.
Quote
As far as I understand (please correct me, djm34, if I'm wrong), the 50% gain is based on the latest opensource kernel by djm34, NOT the one on the sp_ fork, which includes about 10% improvement by sp_ and another 10% by myself.
So the gain at the end should be about 30%.
So the gain at the end should be about 30%.
Looks like he has stolen some code from my fork.
1-may-2015 (Djm34 release his optimized opensource neoscryopt miner)
here is my checkin 3-may-2015 (neoscrypt 7% faster):
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/commit/48072790339fc021f096e20765ed8cd03701c155
(release 49)
Here is his checkin 17-may-2015 (without crediting me):
https://github.com/djm34/ccminer-tpsp/commit/817bcae908684edfb3e4639b0af65968e87f244f
So some of my 10% faster optimalizations has already been included.