Given the poll results so far, does anyone agree that more time should be spent on finding the best name?
Maybe those interested could submit 3 ideas each by a particular date, or something like this. Even then, the final name wouldn't need to be one of those, but it could help trigger more ideas from people. It just seems a bit rushed to me, and re-branding is not something that should be done on a whim.
I most certainly agree with you.
It's impossible for everyone to agree on one thing, but I do honestly believe that if someone comes up with a name that truly "pops", then 2/3 of the people will be down with it. How do you feel about a 2/3 majority on any changes DEV?
yeah, i think everyone, or a majority, will all side with a name at some point, and ill keep my eye on it..
I'm at CES right now and i prefaced and explained the situation we have here with the rebranding to a couple friends at CES, and from their outsider view they thought COGS was a great name.
It represents us as a COG in the fabric of our society (eventually when people are using COGS like dollars).
And i think we should have a policy that there is no one acronym associated with COGS. Just like the coin itself, COGS has it's own meaning for everyone.
My tech friends also agreed that there should be no mention of it's darkness in the name as that immediately creates shade.
What's up DOGEDDEV?? Hope all is well brother.