By the way how do you respond to the fact you said maged agreed that I was swindling people? All he said was I made dishonest statements (and this was never actually shown).
Dishonest statements, defrauding people, swindling are all excellent descriptions of your business models (do you really want to nitpick on the definition of every single word). Unfortunately nobody can read up on how you do business, because you deleted over 1000 posts. Which is a fraudulent act in itself in my book.
Further to that you outright claim I swindled people with fraudulent business schemed (see section DEEPLINK item 4 in OP). How do you respond to this? Because you haven't responded the last 5 times I asked you for an explanation (see recent "falsifying NAV" thread).
How do I respond to my own claim? I agree with it.