Thanks for this list, dunno how I didn't find it sooner. Most of the obvious shills you listed are consistent with what I have seen in other threads.
...
I too agree with this. It has already been established that larger blocks at this time are reckless.
Spreading lies doesn't help the discussion. For most members of the community it is NOT established.
If people like you would explain honestly and patiently why big blocks are bad, and if you would discuss this reason, instead of insulting people, claiming a non-existent consens, bullying alternatives and praising authority, you MAYBE would persuade some people to believe how "reckless" larger blocks are. But with just throwing a false statement into discussion you just ridicule your side.
Currentyl there are several well known developers (e. G. Gavin, Mike Hearn, Andreas Schildbach, Jeff Garzik) that believe that large blocks are possible. With them there are some akteurs of the economy (blockchain, bitpay, coinbase, btcchina, bitstamp, xapo) as well as the majority of the miners and a good bunch of members of bitcointalk that I remember as being most sophisticated early in 2013.
So no,
it is not established that larger blocks do harm at this time. Please - stop spreading lies.