Post
Topic
Board Meta
Re: Should people who promote ponzis in their signature be given a negative trust?
by
kotwica666
on 11/01/2016, 16:26:34 UTC

So if scammer make reasonable rates (Ore-mine, CloudMining.website) can make signature campaign, but when scammer make not reasonable rates can't.

a good guide for the future scammers.
Its not about signature payout rates but about signature campaign of any known ponzi,when you know its ponzi you shouldn't promote this.

I'm not talking about sirnature rates. I'm talking about ponzi rates - Ore-mine with normal rates is not scam, but 12dailycoin (or something like that) is scam.

Very interesting way of thinking.. Or i missed something?

I have been negative trusted for this link in my signature:
http://bitcoin.winspiral.net

They said: it is a ponzi.
I said: it is not a ponzi.
They said: A website with  such an horrible design can only be a ponzi.
I said: (lol)


Yes, i remeber this situation.

Who decide what is ponzi, and what is not? If you don't have proof, it is just your justice - nothing more. I thought that law like this was forgotten around 500 years ago..