You still don't get it do you? First prove that they are ponzis and maybe DT members will start considering a negative feedback. IIRC, Cloudmining.website(even though I highly suspect its a ponzi) has no evidence of being a ponzi, it once displayed the mining proof with one concern being one of the photos was deleted as it was copied. Honest mistake or shady activity? Not enough "data".
Ore-mine, seems to have a sustainable "ROI" and has not yet suggested any reason for it to go "bankrupt" in a few months,heck they even do ad campaigns (not that I'm suggesting it is actually sustainable)

So before pointing out how DT members are not doing their job, using the "power" that was not given to them for being super-active police ninjas, rather for having good judgement acting only when necessary, try helping them instead of crying " Why are you giving negative to X but not X, its unfair muaaaa!" . For god's sake