I have no idea of the context and application of what is being endorsed and why. My brain works very holistically. I load the entire model at once in my head. I need to be able to see it visually in my head.
You need to start with an overview of what you are doing holistically. Otherwise I essentially have to reserve engineer what you are doing which is very painstaking. You shouldn't make me work so hard. I am the reader.
Ridiculous, you're just being obtuse. Its perfectly clear what is being endorsed and why.
Not to me. I have no overall conceptual map of what is being done.
Draw me an overview and then it will click in. Otherwise I have to go try to figure out why you have these B, C, D nodes in the first place. What their role is systemically. Etc..
You accuse me of being disrespectful, now look at the way you are acting.
Final attempt
* A is making transactions, B, C and D are vying for endorsements and all have a connection to A.
B, C, D are other nodes, just like A
* It is the role of the endorsed nodes to vote on what the current state of the ledger should be, and the state with the maximum votes wins.
Reason for B, C, D existence