-snip-
Geez QS, changing sides with an awesome argument , every account. I still wonder how your alts get figured(most of the times I guess they don't)
Edit: What would you say to your own argument here:
You are promoting what is pretty clearly a ponzi that is being deceptive about how they make their money. Not only that but you still have the signature up that caused you to receive negative trust.
If you are really concerned about your reputation, then I would suggest that you stop promoting what is clearly a scam
?
Someone that promotes a ponzi takes away from their reputation, and anyone that knowingly promotes a ponzi is not reputable in my eyes. As I said before, I would not personally advertise something that I had reason to believe is any kind of ponzi. Additionally, I do not think that others should be promoting a ponzi, however I do not believe that those that do promote ponzis are scammers.
I would say that the most effective way to stop people from advertising a ponzi would be to warn them that they are advertising something that
you believe to be a scam, and the majority of the time people will take their paid signatures down.
QS was advising that person to remove the signature of the ponzi if their wish was to maintain a positive reputation. I do not believe that QS's statement contradicts with my previous statement as the lack of having a positive reputation and being a scammer are two different things.